Click following link to check out a collection of classic articles that all psychology students should read.



Psychology Classics On Amazon



Psychology Classics


GPT-3 AI Can Write Like a Human
but Do Not Mistake That for Thinking


GPT-3 AI Can Write Like a Human but Do Not Mistake That for Thinking


Guillaume Thierry, Bangor University


GPT-3 AI Can Write Like a Human but Do Not Mistake That for Thinking


Since it was unveiled earlier this year, the new AI-based language generating software GPT-3 has attracted much attention for its ability to produce passages of writing that are convincingly human-like. Some have even suggested that the program, created by Elon Musk’s OpenAI, may be considered or appears to exhibit, something like artificial general intelligence (AGI), the ability to understand or perform any task a human can. This breathless coverage reveals a natural yet aberrant collusion in people’s minds between the appearance of language and the capacity to think.


Language and thought, though obviously not the same, are strongly and intimately related. And some people tend to assume that language is the ultimate sign of thought. But language can be easily generated without a living soul. All it takes is the digestion of a database of human-produced language by a computer program, AI-based or not.


Based on the relatively few samples of text available for examination, GPT-3 is capable of producing excellent syntax. It boasts a wide range of vocabulary, owing to an unprecedentedly large knowledge base from which it can generate thematically relevant, highly coherent new statements. Yet, it is profoundly unable to reason or show any sign of “thinking”.


For instance, one passage written by GPT-3 predicts you could suddenly die after drinking cranberry juice with a teaspoon of grape juice in it. This is despite the system having access to information on the web that grape juice is edible.


Another passage suggests that to bring a table through a doorway that is too small you should cut the door in half. A system that could understand what it was writing or had any sense of what the world was like would not generate such aberrant “solutions” to a problem.


If the goal is to create a system that can chat, fair enough. GPT-3 shows AI will certainly lead to better experiences than what has been available until now. And it certainly allows for a good laugh.



But if the goal is to get some thinking into the system, then we are nowhere near. That’s because AI such as GPT-3 works by “digesting” colossal databases of language content to produce, “new”, synthesised language content.


The source is language; the product is language. In the middle stands a mysterious black box a thousand times smaller than the human brain in capacity and nothing like it in the way it works.


Reconstructing the thinking that is at the origin of the language content we observe is an impossible task, unless you study the thinking itself. As philosopher John Searle put it, only “machines with internal causal powers equivalent to those of brains” could think.


And for all our advances in cognitive neuroscience, we know deceptively little about human thinking. So how could we hope to program it into a machine?


What mesmerises me is that people go to the trouble of suggesting what kind of reasoning that AI like GTP-3 should be able to engage with. This is really strange, and in some ways amusing – if not worrying.


Why would a computer program, based on AI or not, and designed to digest hundreds of gigabytes of text on many different topics, know anything about biology or social reasoning? It has no actual experience of the world. It cannot have any human-like internal representation.


It appears that many of us fall victim of a mind-language causation fallacy. Supposedly there is no smoke without fire, no language without mind. But GPT-3 is a language smoke machine, entirely hollow of any actual human trait or psyche. It is just an algorithm, and there is no reason to expect that it could ever deliver any kind of reasoning. Because it cannot.

Filling in the gaps


Part of the problem is the strong illusion of coherence we get from reading a passage produced by AI such as GPT-3 because of our own abilities. Our brains were created by hundreds of thousands of years of evolution and tens of thousands of hours of biological development to extract meaning from the world and construct a coherent account of any situation.


When we read a GPT-3 output, our brain is doing most of the work. We make sense that was never intended, simply because the language looks and feels coherent and thematically sound, and so we connect the dots. We are so used to doing this, in every moment of our lives, that we don’t even realise it is happening.


We relate the points made to one another and we may even be tempted to think that a phrase is cleverly worded simply because the style may be a little odd or surprising. And if the language is particularly clear, direct and well constructed (which is what AI generators are optimised to deliver), we are strongly tempted to infer sentience, where there is no such thing.


When GPT-3’s predecessor GPT-2 wrote, “I am interested in understanding the origins of language,” who was doing the talking? The AI just spat out an ultra-shrunk summary of our ultimate quest as humans, picked up from an ocean of stored human language productions – our endless trying to understand what is language and where we come from. But there is no ghost in the shell, whether we “converse” with GPT-2, GPT-3, or GPT-9000.The Conversation


Guillaume Thierry, Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, Bangor University


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.




Hope you enjoyed reading GPT-3 AI Can Write Like a Human but Do Not Mistake That for Thinking. Want to read more great articles?


Fascinating Psychology Articles


See following link to check out a fascinating collection of psychology articles by leading academics and researchers.


Psychology Articles




This Psychology Symbol - Vintage Retro Striped Sunset T-Shirt is available from Amazon (prime eligible) in a range of colors for women and men. Sales help support this website, which has been providing free and comprehensive information and resources for psychology students and educators since 2008.



Woman wearing Psychology Symbol Vintage Retro Sunset T-Shirt.



Recent Articles

  1. Best Psychology Books for Beginners

    Dec 12, 24 06:51 AM

    best psychology books for beginners
    Learn about the mind and behavior with our top picks for the best psychology books for beginners. Start exploring this fascinating field now!

    Read More

  2. Past to Present: The History of Mental Health Treatment in America

    Nov 30, 24 06:55 AM

    Past to Present: The History of Mental Health Treatment in America
    Article exploring the sequence of events that led to our modern understanding of mental illness and maintaining good mental health.

    Read More

  3. The Psychology Of Woodworking: Why It's One Of The Best Hobbies

    Nov 29, 24 03:28 AM

    The Psychology Of Woodworking: Why It's One Of The Best Hobbies You Can Have
    Insightful article on woodworking and how taking it up as a hobby can give you a well-being boost.

    Read More

Know someone who would love to read GPT-3 AI Can Write Like a Human but Do Not Mistake That for Thinking

Share this page with them.



Please help support this website by visiting the All About Psychology Amazon Store to check out an awesome collection of psychology books, gifts and T-shirts.


Psychology T-Shirts on Amazon
Psychology Gifts on Amazon


Back To The Top Of The Page


Go From GPT-3 AI Can Write Like a Human but Do Not Mistake That for Thinking Back To The Home Page