Click following link to check out a collection of classic articles that all psychology students should read.



Psychology Classics On Amazon



Psychology Classics


🧠 Want to reach a psychology-focused audience? Sponsor this page


Turning the Other Lobe: Directional Biases in Brain Diagrams



Richard Wiseman and Adrian M. Owen

Psychology T-Shirts on Amazon
Psychology Gifts on Amazon


Turning the Other Lobe: Directional Biases in Brain Diagrams


Want To Study Psychology?



Psychology Programs




Abstract



Past research shows that in drawn or photographic portraits, people are significantly more likely to be posed facing to their right than their left. We examined whether the same type of bias exists among sagittal images of the human brain. An exhaustive search of Google images using the term ‘brain sagittal view’ yielded 425 images of a left or right facing brain. The direction of each image was coded and revealed that 80% of the brains were right-facing. This bias was present in images that did not contain any representation of a human head. It is argued that the effect might be aesthetic in nature, the result of the Western tradition of reading left to right or due to the facial factors that underlie the bias previously found in portraits.



Keywords



Body perception, cognition, face perception, perception



Prior research has shown that people in both drawn and photographic portraits are more likely to be depicted looking to their right rather than their left (see, e.g., McManus & Humphrey, 1973; Gordon, 1974; Grusser, Selke & Zynda, 1988; Zaidel & Fitzgerald, 1994), and that this is probably due to the increased emotional expressiveness and perceived attractiveness of the left side of the face (Powell & Schirillo, 2009; Blackburn & Schirillo, 2012; Bruno & Bertamini, 2013; Bruno, Bertamini, & Protti, 2015).



Books, journal articles, and websites frequently carry diagrams of human brains, and we examined whether the same type of bias exists among these images. McManus (1979) notes that Dr Edwin Clarke pointed out the bias among 49 images of mediaeval drawings and woodcuts of the brain, and we wanted to discover whether the same bias exists in a much larger collection of more contemporary images. A Google image search using the term 'brain sagittal view' returned a total of 640 unique pictures, and 425 of these contained a human brain facing left or right.



The direction of each brain was coded, along with whether it was embedded within a representation of a head or not (see Figure 1). In line with previous research, 80% of the diagrams depicted a brain looking to its right (chi-squared = 82.67, df = 1, p < .01: Cramer’s V = 0.31: 95% CI [0.35, 0.51]).



Turning the Other Lobe: Directional Biases in Brain Diagrams


Figure 1. An illustration the 'right', 'left' and 'head', 'no-head' coding employed during the study.



Significantly, more brains were right facing in both the 'no head' (78.6%, chi-squared = 51.69, df = 1, p < .01: Cramer’s V = 0.30: 95% CI [0.31, 0.51]) and 'head' (83.1%, chi-Squared = 30.47, df = 1, p < .01: Cramer’s V = 0.35: 95% CI [0.32, 0.61]) conditions, and the difference between the conditions was not significant (chi-squared = .85, p = .36: df = 1, Cramer’s V = 0.05: 95% CI [-0.05, 0.31]), suggesting that the bias is not enhanced by the presence of head-related cues.


There is no structural or functional reason to depict the brain facing in one particular direction, and the bias may be due to several factors. For example, it could be the result of graphic artists finding it more aesthetically pleasing to have the brain facing to its right. Alternatively, because those in Western cultures read left to right, it makes more sense to encounter the anterior part of any image prior to the posterior (Suitner & McManus, 2011). Finally, it is possible that the effect might be, at least to some degree, due to seeing a greater proportion of portraits facing the right.


In addition, the same method was used to analyze roughly the same number of human profiles, and revealed additional evidence to support the notion that portraits of actual faces tend to be right facing (Google search term: 'face side view', N = 465, right facing 57.6%, chi-squared = 5.16, p = .02: df?= 1, Cramer’s V = 0.08; 95% CI [0.25, 0.42]).


In short, it is clear that in addition to turning the other cheek, many people are also turning the other lobe.





Declaration of Conflicting Interests



The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.



Funding



The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AMO is supported by the Canada Excellence Research Chair (CERC) program.



References



Blackburn K., Schirillo J. (2012) Emotive hemispheric differences measured in real-life portraits using pupil diameter and subjective aesthetic preferences. Experimental Brain Research 219: 447–455. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3091-y. 


Bruno N., Bertamini M. (2013) Self-portraits: Smartphones reveal a side bias in non-artists. PLoS One 8: e55141, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055141. 


Bruno N., Bertamini M., Protti F. (2015) Selfie and the city: A world-wide, large, and ecologically valid database reveals a two-pronged side bias in naive self-portraits. PLoS One 10: e01224999. 


Gordon I. (1974) Left and right in art. In: O’Hare D. (ed.) Psychology and the arts, Brighton, England: Harvester Press, pp. 211–241. 


Grusser O. J., Selke T., Zynda B. (1988) Cerebral lateralisation and some implications for art, aesthetic perception, and artistic creativity. In: Reutshcler I., Herzberger B., Epstein D. (eds) Beauty & the brain: Biological aspects of aesthetics, Boston, MA: Berkhaluer Verlag, pp. 257–293. 


McManus C., Humphrey N. (1973) Turning the left cheek. Nature 243: 271–272. 


McManus, I. C. (1979). Determinants of laterality in man (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Cambridge, England. 


Powell W. R., Schirillo J. A. (2009) Asymmetrical facial expressions in portraits and hemispheric laterality: A literature review. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 14: 545–572. doi:10.1080/13576500802680336. 


Suitner C., McManus I. C. (2011) Aesthetic asymmetries, spatial agency, and art history: A social psychological perspective. In: Schubert T. W., Maas A. (eds) Spatial dimensions of social thought, Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 277–301. 


Zaidel D. W., Fitzgerald P. (1994) Sex of the face in Western art: Left and right in portraits. Empirical Studies of the Arts 12: 9. 



Article Information



"Turning the Other Lobe: Directional Biases in Brain Diagrams" by Richard Wiseman and Adrian M. Owen is licensed under CC BY 3.0.


Volume: 8 issue: 3,


Article first published online: May 18, 2017; Issue published: June 1, 2017.


DOI: 10.1177/2041669517707769. 


Articles from i-Perception are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications.




Recent Articles

  1. Promoted Psychology Books | All-About-Psychology.com Showcase

    May 07, 25 10:37 AM

    Book cover for The Psychology of the Extreme by Arie W. Kruglanski and Sophia Moskalenko
    Discover standout titles featured through expert psychology book promotion. See what authors are sharing—and how their work is reaching new readers.

    Read More

  2. Psychology of the Extreme: The Science Behind Extreme Human Behavior

    May 07, 25 09:16 AM

    Book review quote for Psychology of the Extreme by Arie W. Kruglanski and Sophia Moskalenko, praising its scientific depth and accessibility
    Unlock the psychology of the extreme — why people risk it all, break norms, and defy logic. A gripping dive into the science of radical human behavior.

    Read More

  3. The Quest for Significance Book by Arie Kruglanski and Dan Raviv

    May 06, 25 08:55 AM

    The Quest for Significance" by Arie Kruglanski and Dan Raviv – book cover with a review quote by Claude Steele, Stanford University
    Discover the Quest for Significance book—a powerful exploration of human motivation, purpose, and the drive behind extreme behaviors and everyday choices.

    Read More


New! Comments

Have your say about what you just read! Leave me a comment in the box below.

New! Comments

Have your say about what you just read! Leave me a comment in the box below.




Back To The Top Of The Page


Go To The Home Page